This morning, I received a submission from an ambitious
young author. He self-published his novel last year, and now he wants to find a
wider audience through a traditional publisher. Good for him. Indeed, I know
how he feels. Or in the words of Maya Angelou:
“There is no greater agony than bearing an untold story
inside you.”
Unfortunately, his approach will probably do him more harm
than good. For,
he didn’t just ignore our submission instructions entirely;
and
he didn’t just NOT give the information I need, in order
to give him a fair hearing; and
he didn’t send sample chapters (which, at least, agents do
sometimes request).
Instead, he sent a PDF copy of his published e-book. And at
the top of page 1, it gave a stern warning that forbade me to read it:
This book is licensed
for your personal enjoyment only. This Book may not be re-sold or given away to
other people. If you would like to share this book with another person, please
purchase an additional copy for each recipient. If you’re reading this book and
did not purchase it, or it was not purchased for your use only, then please
return to the original owner and purchase your own copy. Thank you for
respecting the hard work of this author.
I almost felt guilty for opening the file. (Surely the
publishing police were watching?) One thing for sure, I didn’t read any
further. Not because I truly feared reprisals, but because of the author’s lack
of professionalism.
Could I look past his noncompliance, to evaluate his book on
its merits? Sure I could, and I do all the time. But then I noticed his genre: "Christian YA SciFi/Fantasy novella."
Really? Maybe this mashup genre exists
somewhere in the world, but generally SpecFic novels run 80,000 words and up,
while a novella (half that size or less) almost always has to be an adult
romance. Also, each of those five categories has rules of its own. I just
checked my list of 850 acquisitions editors, and I can’t find a single one that
handles them all.
But enough ranting about this author. I have a couple of dirty
secrets to confess:
First, I don’t read e-books, so this clause took me by
surprise. Turns out, it’s quite common; shame on me for not knowing.
Second, for at least the past 40 years, I’ve been buying
used books (with no additional royalty to the author). I share books with my
friends. I lend to them, and they lend to me. In some cases (gasp!), we even
give away books for free and for keeps. In this way, two or more people can
read the same copy of the same book, even though only one paid for the
privilege. From what I hear, this has been going on for hundreds of years, all over the world, with
no legal restrictions.
But I’m forbidden to do this with an e-book?
Yes, I certainly understand the concerns for piracy, for
unauthorized copying. As agent and an author, my livelihood could be ruined.
But as a reader? I ain’t down wit dat.
.
.
The difference is when you share a traditional book, you don't have it anymore. When you share an ebook, you still have it and the new person has it. What you're really doing is taking the book to 'copy shop' and making illegal copies then passing them out free. Hardly the same thing.
ReplyDeleteNot necessarily, Devlin. That warning forbids me to even let you read my copy on my kindle.
ReplyDelete