I don’t know where it comes from, but it’s true: The
publishing business seems to be the only profession on earth where so many
untrained, unaccomplished amateurs claim to be experts. They’ve never published
a book, never snared an agent, don’t really know how to work the system. Never
negotiated a book contract or attended a writers' conference, and don’t know a split
infinitive from a split pea. Yet they populate the online forums and chat rooms,
preaching with supreme confidence and dogmatic certainty (with lousy spelling
and grammar, I might add), dispensing advice to others.
.
.
So what kind of counsel do they offer? Briefly, these are
the “scams” that you should look for when looking for an agent. Legitimate
agents:
.
.
1 – Never advertise.
They are already known, and writers come to them.
.
.
Indeed, yes, I know plenty of veteran agents who get
hundreds of queries per week and don’t need to advertise. But the guys in this
league sign only 2-3 new clients (if any) per year, almost always by referral.
In the real world, despite their inexperience, the ones who actively market
themselves probably have more knowledge and contacts than you do. They’re the
ones looking to build a stable and are likely to sign you.
2 – Will never ask you to pay him.
.
No doubt, you should avoid a rep who charges a reading fee.
But most will nonetheless require you to reimburse them for expenses they incur
on your behalf, such as postage for a manuscript. Is this evil? Well, just
imagine that you have a friend who is down on his luck, and you let him crash
on your couch for a few weeks until he gets a job. Fine. But then he starts
eating your food and asking to borrow money. That was never a part of your deal. It’s the same with an agent:
When you hire me, you’re essentially renting my knowledge and my Rolodex. If
you ask me to spend my own money on you, then that changes the nature of our
relationship. That wasn’t a part of our deal.
.
.
3 – Will never ask you
to pay anyone else.
.
.
Now, where did you get such an idea? Occasionally I might
read a manuscript with a good story, but it needs help in the execution. So I
suggest that the author seek out (and pay!)
a freelance editor to help her smooth out the rough edges, and resubmit within
three months. It’s a great way to score a second chance. Perhaps you’ve heard a
legend about a benevolent agent who loves editing and has nothing else to do. But
it’s definitely not normal. Or would you rather I reject your manuscript altogether?
.
.
4 – Will not have a sideline as a publisher or a
freelance editor.
.
.
And why not? Unlike most people, agents don’t get a weekly
paycheck. They need to make a living in-between book deals. Advances are tiny these days, if you get one at all. (Which, incidentally, depends more on you than your agent.) For this reason, most agents have a second business: editing, publishing, consulting, a law practice, or something completely unrelated to publishing. Some openly advertise it, while others work strictly on referral. If that business combination makes you nervous, you can find someone else. But do you really want to limit your choices this way?
.
.
5 – Probably won’t be
found at a writers’ conference.
.
.
The logic here is that, because writers seek out conferences
that offer opportunities to pitch their work, the organizers will probably
accept any self-proclaimed “agent” into their faculty. But seeing as the
reputation (and future business) of the conference depends on the quality of
their speakers, no conference director has anything to gain by doing so.
.
.
6 – Will always have a
website, blog, social media, and listings in the market guides.
.
.
Now, this one is just plain silly. Many of the most
successful and reputable agents out there have been in business for decades,
and don’t need the help. Some are semi-retired, and only accept new clients by
referral. Many are dropping their listings in the market guides altogether. Why
should they offer false hope to new authors by inviting submissions they will
never read?
.
.
7 – Must be a member of the Association of Authors’ Representatives.
.
.
Actually, far less than half of the practicing agents in the
U.S. ever bother to join AAR (just as most doctors never join the AMA), because
it doesn’t do anything for their business. Yes, the group requires its members
to follow a strict code of ethics. Which means that a member agent probably
isn’t a crook (comforting to know), but it says nothing about their competence
to sell your manuscript.
.
.
8 – Will naturally
have a verified record of sales in Publisher’s Marketplace.
.
.
Maybe, maybe not. Reporting book deals to PM is not the same as your employer reporting
your weekly wages to the IRS. There is no automated process for this. Sometimes
the agent reports it, sometimes the publisher does; but it’s never going to be
at the top of anyone’s to-do list. As with websites and market guides, some
agents opt out altogether because they don’t want to be found. A lack of a PM
profile proves nothing, good or bad.
.
.
9 – Won’t “shotgun” your
submission (send it off to too many publishers at once).
.
.
Huh? You want your work to be seen by fewer publishers? I can’t speak for anyone else, but I won’t take
on a new project unless I can immediately think of at least two dozen places to
pitch it on Day One.
.
.
10 – Must serve as an apprentice under another agent, before going into business
for himself.
.
.
No doubt, this is a good training ground. But most of the
agents I know, came into the profession through other avenues: some worked as
editors for publishing companies, while others earned their stripes as authors.
Others, like myself, followed a more unconventional career path. But after I’ve
made a couple dozen sales and my clients love me, does it really matter?
.
.
11 – Won’t represent
themselves as specialists in repping only new authors.
.
.
The rationale is that they give false hope to desperate
inexperienced writers. But wait! Every new agent has to start somewhere, and they
probably won’t land a household-name client at first. Hence the only clients
they are likely to attract in the early going, are newbies. A partnership among
rookies, could very well be a good match.
.
.
12 – Won’t submit your
work to publishers who don’t require agented submissions.
.
.
Sure, you might be able to catch an editor’s attention on
your own, but then what? Legions of authors squander this opportunity because
they don’t know what to do next. An agent’s job is more than just getting your
work in front of editors. He can also help you polish your manuscript, teach
you how to work the system, and negotiate a better deal.
.
The list goes on: Beware the agent who solicits your
business. Or sends off multiple submissions to a publisher in a single envelope
(as if agents used envelopes). Or suggests you pay for marketing, or anything
else that might advance your career.
.
You’ll find just as many conspiracy theories about
publishers, or freelances editors, or any other industry professional:
Essentially, anyone who doesn’t give away the store to every author in every deal,
is obviously either incompetent or greedy or corrupt.
.
.
These aspiring authors refuse to accept the reality that
writing books is not a job; it’s self-employment. That they are themselves the
owner and bookkeeper and chief bottle washer of an enterprise that will live or
die, struggle or thrive, on the strength of their own efforts. There's no labor
union, no minimum wage, no paid holidays, no overtime, no forum of appeal for low
pay or lousy medical benefits or unsafe working conditions.
.
.
When I meet new writers, they want to know the secret to
success in publishing. I tell them to take a class, find a mentor, attend
conferences, buy a few reference books, join a writer's group, invite brutal
critiques, and hire a professional editor. Then when they a have a decent
manuscript to offer, start pitching agents and publishers according to their prescribed guidelines. Pay your dues, then pay
it forward. THIS is the way to learn
the business, to know who’s who, and who to trust, and to distinguish the vultures
from the doves.
.
But few people are satisfied with that answer. Instead they argue, I can’t afford it! I don’t have time! I shouldn’t have to! It’s not fair! They have no interest in learning the craft or the business, they just want to sell what they already have. But wait; what did they really expect from me? To wave a magic wand and sprinkle their manuscripts with pixie dust?
.
But few people are satisfied with that answer. Instead they argue, I can’t afford it! I don’t have time! I shouldn’t have to! It’s not fair! They have no interest in learning the craft or the business, they just want to sell what they already have. But wait; what did they really expect from me? To wave a magic wand and sprinkle their manuscripts with pixie dust?
.
Traditional publishing is dead, they insist; self-pub and
e-books are the wave of the future. Gatekeepers are out; author empowerment is
in. So they self-pub their unedited novel, slap on a lousy cover, and sell
twelve copies. But rather than to learn from the experience and accept
responsibility for their own bad choices, they wail to the highest heavens and
angrily blame others for their failure. Agents, freelance editors, and
publishers only want to make money off of their cherished progeny.
How do I plead? GUILTY! Yes, believe it or not, we’re all in
this business to make a living. Or did you really expect us to pay you and work
for free?
No comments:
Post a Comment